For
our preliminary task we had to organise ourselves in to groups and shoot a 1-2
minute sequence to show a person entering a room and speaking to someone else. In
this task we had to demonstrate the 180 degree rule, match on action, shot
reverse shot and continuity.
I think
that our camerawork was good overall; however there were parts that we could
have improved on quite a lot. We used a variety of shots including long shots,
mid-shots and close ups. We used a close up on the antagonist’s face during
this scene which I think was effective as it showed his expression and created
a tense atmosphere. As well as that, we used a long shot as the two
protagonists were entering the room to show location. It was also shot using a
high angled shot to show that the protagonists were at the antagonist’s whim. I
think that this shot could have been done better if we had a tripod that worked
as we could have held the camera steadier so that it looked more professional. I
think that the shakiness throughout this whole scene detracted from the overall
quality of our finished sequence, as it made it look more amateur. During the
start of this sequence we chose to leave out the antagonist’s face to add a
sense of mystery to the scene. If I were to film this again, I would put some
shadows across the antagonist’s face to make him seem more evil like Norman
Bates has in ‘Psycho’ during the parlour scene. We met the 180 degree rule
criteria as we did not break it. Furthermore, we used a close up of one of the
protagonist’s hands to show his finger tapping. This was effective as it showed
the viewer how tense the character was feeling. However, we could have made it
better if we used a match on action to show which character’s hand it was. We could
have used a shot of the character before we used the close up. In this
sequence, we also weren’t very careful when positioning the tripod as you can
see it in the reflection of a computer. If I were to do it again, I would make
sure to compose my shots more carefully.
I think
that our editing was effective as it didn’t show any jumps or glitches between
scenes, it all ran relatively smoothly. If we had more time to edit, we could
have made the shots run more smoothly together. We managed to stick to the 180
degree rule during filming the conversation in this sequence. As well as that, I
think that we effectively used match on action during this scene. As one of the
characters goes to open the door, we successfully edited the shots together so
that the motion looked smooth as he was pulling down the door handle and
entering the room. However, we could have made the match on action better
towards the end of the scene, as one of the characters taps his finger; however
it is unclear whose hand it is. As the characters are talking we showed a shot
reverse shot which was effective as it links the characters together and makes
the conversation feel more natural. I do not think that our use of titles was
particularly effective as it was rushed and looked quite boring. If we had
managed our time better, we could have spent more time making the title
sequence look more interesting and thriller like. We could have used some sound
effects as the names came in to make the sequence look more dynamic and
professional. The only visual effect we used was a CCTV like one as the characters
were walking in to the scene. I think this was effective because it added some
variety to the sequence; however we could have made it look better if the
camera was on a tripod so it would be less shaky.
I do
not think the lighting was very successful or effective during this sequence. At
the start we chose for the room to be dark to add a tense atmosphere; however I
think it was ineffective as the viewer can’t really see anything. If we had
access to more lighting opportunities then I think we could have made this
scene look more effective, however was just had the main lights in the room. After
the beginning of this sequence, lighting didn’t play a major role in creating
an atmosphere. If we were to do this again, I would create more shadows in this
scene to fit in with the thriller genre.
During
shooting and editing this preliminary sequence I have learnt that I need to be more
time conscious as we spent too much time on certain things, and didn’t leave
enough time for things like the title sequence. As well as that I have learned
that I need to compose a shot more carefully so that there are no mistakes in
the final edit. I also need to use a tripod more effectively so that the camera
keeps steady, so that the final product looks more professional. We also
learned how to effectively plan shooting a sequence through the use of story
boards and shot lists. I wish to improve on making sound more effective and
thriller like during my final thriller task. I also want to include more
transitions so that it is a bit more visually appealing and interesting to
watch. When planning my final thriller task, I also want to work more on the
script so that we have an exact plan on what we want to shoot.
You have shot an effective prelim Michael - it is of a proficient level (about grade C /B). Your camera skills are sound and editing shows continuity. Focus on develop these skills further for your thriller - consider how lighting sources affect the quality of your production. Also aim for a wide range of shots and smooth camera movement.
ReplyDeleteYour evaluation is sound - you use technical terms confidently to evaluate your work and can identify examples to support your opinions from your work. You need to add some analysed stills - four in total - to show your skills. You also need to upload your prelim from You Tube to your blog.
Remember that you need to use a range of presentational devices in your blog - this is a bit text heavy at present so ensure that you include this.